Friday, 5 November 2010

First Case of Judicial Review

First Case of Judicial Review

Marbury v. Madison (1801)

Facts of the Case:
The case began on March 2, 1801, when an obscure Federalist, William Marbury, was designated as a justice of the peace in the District of Columbia. Marbury and several others were appointed to government posts created by Congress in the last days of John Adams's presidency, but these last-minute appointments were never fully finalized. The disgruntled appointees invoked an act of Congress and sued for their jobs in the Supreme Court. http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1803/1803_0/
Decision:
First decision by the Supreme Court to declare a law unconstitutional (1803).

• At the very end of his term, President John Adams had made many federal appointments, including William Marbury as justice of the peace in the District of Columbia.
• Thomas Jefferson, the new president, refused to recognize the appointment of Marbury.
• The normal practice of making such appointments was to deliver a "commission," or notice, of appointment. This was normally done by the Secretary of State. Jefferson's Secretary of State at the time was James Madison.
• At the direction of Jefferson, Madison refused to deliver Marbury's commission. Marbury sued Madison, and the Supreme Court took the case.
• Chief Justice John Marshall wrote that the Judiciary Act of 1789, which spelled out the practice of delivering such commissions for judges and justices of the peace, was unconstitutional because it the gave the Supreme Court authority that was denied it by Article III of the Constitution. Thus, the Supreme Court said, the Judiciary Act of 1789 was illegal and not to be followed.
This was the first time the Supreme Court struck down a law because it was unconstitutional. It was the beginning of the practice of "judicial review."
http://www.socialstudiesforkids.com/wwww/us/marburydef.htm

Source:
http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1803/1803_0/
http://www.socialstudiesforkids.com/wwww/us/marburydef.htm

1 comment:

  1. This reminds me of administrative law. Judicial review is a good way to control the power of the public bodies so that they cannot unfairly exercise their power.But there was a huge confusion regarding public bodies and private bodies.Who can be referred as public body?But things are much more clear now.

    ReplyDelete